On the issue of standing …..

Federal Justice Decides that “the Hurt feelings” of a few is more important to courts in determining standing than a corrupt government breaking its covenant with the people, i.e. The Constitution of the United States.

U.S. District Judge Barbara B. Crabb of Wisconsin, ruled that a person's hurt feelings give a small group standing to sue the Federal government in the case involving the National Day of Prayer. (See the WND Artcle) Yet this same group of people (Federal Judges) say that “We, the People” have no standing but frivolously abuse the courts in demanding that our government constrain itself to the constitutional compact that we made with it, as they did in the Kerchner et al v. Obama et al case that was just rejected by the 3^rd Circuit Court of Appeals that is seeking the court to determine if Obama is in fact an Article II, Natural Born Citizen as REQUIRED by the Constitution of the United States of America.

The fact is no person, no government agency, no branch of government with the authority to determine just who is a natural born citizen as required under Article II, Section 1 has stated that Obama is in fact a natural born citizen. Not one single entity with the authority to make such a determinate has come forward to altar of justice to anoint the One. But they all have come forward to say we have no standing to challenge their actions, or in the case of the courts, inaction's.

What can I say to try and make sense of this?

Gee Toto; I guess we're not in Kansas anymore!